01 / $3,039 record
2024: $1,282 for the initial booking
The Kos order was for five days, 7–11 May. It lists US$1,000 for services and discounted air tickets of US$201.53. The transportation total of US$281.53 includes US$80 in transfers. The final amount is US$1,281.53, rounded by the agency to US$1,282.
The source estimates transfers at US$80–85, but its final total uses US$80. I retain the final order amount rather than adding the higher estimate again. The agency acknowledged receiving a payment on 5 May; that acknowledgment gives no amount.
02 / $3,039 record
2024: $715 requested for the replacement
After the first trip was interrupted according to the agency, it proposed a replacement. The flight calculation listed a US$1,505 standard total, less US$590.11 in savings and US$200 of manager funding. The resulting request was US$714.89, rounded to US$715.
An email dated 11 May acknowledges a transfer and announces cancellation of the flight booking. It does not state how much was received. The correspondence supports associating it with the supplement, while the exact debit remains a matter for the payment receipt.
03 / $3,039 record
2026: $1,042 for the new Tenerife booking
The order for 9–13 October gives a discounted five-day service price of US$800, discounted flights of US$161.77 and estimated transfers of US$80. These add up to US$1,041.77, rounded to US$1,042.
The service’s standard US$1,600 price and the standard US$489 airfare are comparison figures in that order, so I do not add them to the discounted total. The order text itself does not show the final payment method or bank debit.
04 / $3,039 record
$485 requested: not added to money paid
The agency presents an overall standard price of $2,427 and a new amount of $485 after claimed reductions and financing. The offer appears twice in the export. It is treated as one request.
I first refuse another advance, then offer the $485 by cryptocurrency immediately after meeting the companion. The supplied emails contain no proof of that transfer. It is therefore excluded from the paid subtotal.
05 / $3,039 record
€1,060.98: the separate return-flight purchase
I confirm paying €1,060.98 for the replacement companion’s return flights, bought directly after the agency offered that option. My booking confirmation was sent to the agency. This expense is separate from the $3,039 already paid to it.
The agency subsequently confirmed that the companion did not board the outbound flight. The €1,060.98 covers the purchased return itinerary, not just the missed outbound leg. The amount was clarified by the customer on 12 October (E40); the receipt remains private. The agency’s $947 quote and the $485 supplement request are kept separate from this purchase.
06 / $3,039 record
Why the record shows $3,039
The three historical amounts before rounding are $1,281.53 + $714.89 + $1,041.77 = $3,038.19. Their requested rounded values total $3,039, a difference of $0.81. The new customer email independently supplies the same stated $3,039 total but remains a customer statement, not bank reconciliation.
07 / $3,039 record
How the earlier deposit is treated
The initial 2024 amount appears once in the calculation. Promised future services, bonus miles and discounts do not create additional customer payments in this record. The 2026 order is counted as a new amount because it has its own price.
The available summaries do not give a transaction-by-transaction reconciliation of the old deposit. The refund page separately records the agency’s statements about compensation and its later claim that the deposit had been used.
08 / $3,039 record
Why I refer to more than $4,000 overall
“More than $4,000” is my overall expenditure statement: $3,039 paid to the agency, plus €1,060.98 paid directly for the replacement companion’s return flights. The €1,060.98 is a separate expense; it is not included in the agency’s $3,039 subtotal. Both amounts are now specified in their original currencies. An exact combined USD figure requires the applicable EUR/USD conversion rate.
The precise original-currency breakdown is USD 3,039 + EUR 1,060.98. An exact USD equivalent follows the formula 3,039 + (1,060.98 × USD per EUR). The payment conversion rate has not been supplied, so the website publishes the original-currency amounts alongside my overall estimate. The estimate already includes the agency subtotal and is not added to it again.
09 / $3,039 record
12 October transport: another payment condition, no price supplied
The agency requires renewed transport payment and says the exact amount will follow confirmation. The final customer email asks for that price. No new quotation amount or payment is supplied.
The agency links continued availability and exceptional arrangements to confirmation and transport payment. I again offer a contribution after actual arrival, then request the precise amount. The source establishes a negotiation, without an agreed or paid new charge.
010 / $3,039 record
Five days promised; the customer asks for a commercial adjustment
I refer to the five-day compensation offered in 2024 and ask how it was applied. I also estimate that a 12 October arrival before my 15 October departure would leave three service days, and propose considering the value of the other two toward transport.
The agency acknowledges the original five full days but rejects responsibility for the reduced stay. No agreed prorated credit, day-rate deduction or monetary refund appears. No such deduction is entered in the totals.
QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS RECORD
A few more details.
Are these Global Escort’s current prices?
These are the amounts quoted for my specific 2024 and 2026 bookings. They are not a current public tariff, an offer or a statement about what another customer would pay.
Should I add $485 or $947 to $3,039?
The additional return-flight expense is €1,060.98, as clarified by the customer. The $485 is a separate request with no established payment, and $947 is the agency’s earlier airfare quote. Neither is substituted for or added to the €1,060.98 direct purchase.
Is $3,039 an independently verified loss?
The figures are the customer’s reported expenditure: $3,039 paid to the agency and €1,060.98 for return flights bought directly. The source for each amount is stated. The site does not present a bank-reconciled net loss or invent a currency conversion or refund amount.
Are the booking references or receipts public?
The website publishes selected order figures and email excerpts. Full reservation identifiers, personal data and complete private documents are withheld.
Should I add $3,039 and $4,000?
The $3,039 concerns payments to the agency. I also paid €1,060.98 directly for the replacement companion’s return flights. My reference to “more than $4,000” covers those two expenses together. The site preserves their original currencies and does not invent a USD conversion rate.
11 October flight missed according to the agency. On 12 October, its cancellation interpretation is expressly disputed; the last supplied email asks for the new transport price. No later reply, meeting or refund is documented.